The 2018 Starbucks Racial Insensitivity Backlash
The 2018 Starbucks Racial Insensitivity Backlash
What Happened at Starbucks?
In April 2018, an incident at a Starbucks in Philadelphia made headlines across the country. Two Black men, Rashon Nelson and Donte Robinson, entered a Starbucks to meet a friend. They waited without ordering anything, which is common at many coffee shops. But a Starbucks employee called the police, claiming the men were trespassing. They were arrested and escorted out by officers.
A bystander filmed the arrest, and the video spread quickly online. People were outraged. It seemed like an everyday actionâwaiting for a friendâhad been turned into an unnecessary police matter just because of the menâs race.
The backlash was fast and fierce. People called for boycotts, and protests were organized outside the Philadelphia Starbucks and beyond. The incident became a symbol of racial bias and injustice.
Starbucks Responds to the Outrage
Starbucks knew it needed to act. CEO Kevin Johnson apologized and said the company would learn from this incident. The company then made a big decision. On May 29, 2018, Starbucks closed more than 8,000 stores across the United States for a day of racial bias training. This training was meant to teach employees about recognizing and preventing unconscious bias.
The move was unprecedented. No company of this size had ever shut down for a full day to address racial issues. Starbucks invited experts in racial sensitivity to help design the training. Employees watched videos, took part in discussions, and completed exercises aimed at promoting understanding.
But not everyone was convinced. Some saw the move as a positive step toward change. Others thought it was just a public relations effort to protect the companyâs image. The question remained: Would this training actually change anything?
The Bigger Picture of Racial Bias
The Starbucks incident didnât happen in a vacuum. It highlighted a bigger issue: racial profiling and bias. Many people of color experience being treated with suspicion or facing unfair treatment in public spaces. This moment brought those issues to light on a national level.
According to a study by NPR, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, more than half of Black Americans said they had experienced racial discrimination when trying to rent or buy a home, apply for a job, or interact with the police. This kind of bias isnât just about rude behavior; it can have serious consequences on a personâs life and opportunities.
The Effect on Starbucks
The incident in Philadelphia affected Starbucks in many ways. The company faced protests, negative press, and online criticism. The video of Nelson and Robinsonâs arrest received millions of views. Many customers felt angry and hurt. The brand, known for being welcoming and community-focused, took a hit.
But Starbucks also used the moment as a wake-up call. The racial bias training day was just one part of its response. The company committed to changing its policies. For example, it updated its âthird placeâ policy, stating that all customers are welcome to use the space, even if they do not make a purchase. This policy aimed to create a more inclusive environment.
Starbucksâ decision to close thousands of stores for training came at a cost. The company lost an estimated $16.7 million in revenue for that one day. But the leadership felt it was necessary to show they were serious about addressing bias.
Was the Training Effective?
Itâs tough to say how much one day of training can do. Some experts in racial sensitivity praised Starbucks for taking such a bold step. They believed that the training could at least start a conversation and help employees become more aware of their own biases.
Others argued that one day isnât enough. Unconscious bias is deep-rooted and needs ongoing work. Training programs need to be reinforced regularly to have lasting effects. Itâs not just about teaching staff what bias looks like, but also giving them tools to act fairly and thoughtfully every day.
After the training, Starbucks pledged to keep working on racial issues. It promised to continue training and to hold workshops on inclusion and equity. Whether this led to real change in every store is hard to measure. But it showed that companies could take significant steps to address issues if they chose to.
Lessons Learned
The Starbucks backlash was a turning point for the company and for public conversations about bias. Here are some lessons that can be taken from this event:
For Companies:
- Take Accountability: When mistakes happen, own them. Starbucksâ decision to apologize and take action showed that accountability matters.
- Invest in Training: One-time training sessions help, but continuous education is better. Companies should regularly provide learning opportunities on racial bias and inclusion.
- Listen to Feedback: Pay attention to what customers and employees are saying. Their input can guide meaningful changes.
For Employees:
- Stay Aware: Recognize that bias can show up in unexpected ways. Understanding your own reactions helps in treating everyone fairly.
- Take Part in Training: Participate fully in any training offered. Itâs an opportunity to grow and learn.
- Speak Up: If you see bias, say something. Change often starts when people are brave enough to point out a problem.
For Society:
- Continue the Conversation: One incident shouldnât be the end of the story. Keep talking about racial bias and how to prevent it.
- Support Change: Support businesses and leaders that take real steps toward inclusion. Push for policies that protect people from discrimination.
- Challenge Assumptions: Everyone has biases. The key is to be aware of them and work to change them.
Moving Forward
The 2018 Starbucks incident was a moment that made people stop and think. It showed how one event can spark a conversation and lead to change. The companyâs response, including its racial bias training day, set a standard for other big companies. While not perfect, it was a step in the right direction.
As we move forward, the goal is to keep learning and improving. Businesses and individuals can take steps to ensure that public spaces are welcoming for everyone. The lessons from the Starbucks backlash remind us that change is possible but requires effort and commitment. Taking meaningful actions, like reviewing workplace policies and having open discussions, can create a better environment for all.
In the end, itâs not just about avoiding backlash or protecting a companyâs image. Itâs about building a community where everyone feels respected. For those looking to manage their presence and ensure fair treatment, services like guaranteed removals can be part of a broader strategy to maintain a positive and inclusive space. The journey may be long, but steps like these make it clear that progress is worth it.
Since youâre here âŠ
⊠we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading Side-Line Magazine than ever but advertising revenues across the media are falling fast. Unlike many news organisations, we havenât put up a paywall â we want to keep our journalism as open as we can - and we refuse to add annoying advertising. So you can see why we need to ask for your help.
Side-Lineâs independent journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we want to push the artists we like and who are equally fighting to survive.
If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps fund it, our future would be much more secure. For as little as 5 US$, you can support Side-Line Magazine â and it only takes a minute. Thank you.
The donations are safely powered by Paypal.
